Friday, February 15, 2008

The Jackal of Arabia

I will not call him the fox because for me Imad Mughniyeh is like the Jackal Character , for over 20 years this man was a puzzle for the Americans and the Israelis , millions were spent to catch him but in vain and another 25 Million U.S dollars were added to anyone who lead to the man.

Again I did not know anything about the man because our main press and media did not speak about him even as a wanted man ,I do not know why may be because of his Iranian connection , I mean the Press in Egypt talked about Carlos for age where he was in my point of view is a guerilla. Now I found out that this man is like a legend in secret warfare , for 20 years the biggest secret services failed in catching him ,in fact they did not have any picture for him except those two ancient ones from the 1980s , they were chasing a ghost ,a phantom , and it was not a surprise that the ghost and the phantom were among the names the people called him by.

In 1996 Bill Clinton ordered 3 warships to head for the Gulf because they believed that he was in a ship in front of Qatar called "Ibn Tafil" ,the marines went to get the man who killed their buddies ,the problem they did not know how he looked like , in other words they were not sure from the 1980s shots

For 20 years this man kept a low profile in his homeland in order to building a militia that sooner became a state inside a state ,in fact it is more powerful than the state in our case and no one can deny this , the man is more than a fighter ,he had this leadership mind set.

His only biographer in the Arab world is the Egyptian Magdy Kamal said to Al-Arabiya Network says that he was the real founder of the Shiite group and he was the teacher of Hassan Nasrallah ,yet he preferred to be no.2 and leave the leadership of the group to Nasrallah because he did not like the light , well I do not know , Mr. Kamal may be is the expert we should not forget that the Shiites groups like to be led by a religious cleric , a sheikh , due to their ideologies that the Sheikhs or the Mullahs have a direct connection with God .

Mr.Magdy Kamal published his book about Haj Imad from two years ago and with my all respect I feel that there are lots of bias against Imad in his talk and surely in his book , already Kamal identifies himself as Arabic Nationalist in other words he hates Iran to the bones and it is obvious when he accused Late Imad of spreading Shiite believes among Hamas leadership !! Strangely Hamas is proudly identify itself as Sunni and it has no Shiite among them , it is a MB Sunni group.

Already Mr. Kamal says that it is strange that Imad would be killed like this , he either died from awhile in a normal death and Hezbollah decided to fabricate a heroic scenario in order to hit many birds with one stone , first destroy the Hariri anniversary "they seem to me that they failed today" and to create martyrdom to their man

79750612

Mr. Kamal even goes to far and say that the man is still alive and that he did this so he would be free from the chase , I am sorry for more than 20 years the man succeeded in having a low profile do not you think it is too late to get tired from the chase!!?? I mean he is not like Ali Hassan Salameh a.k.a the red prince ,enjoying his life in the craziness of 1970s.The only recent two shots for him were released only in the last 48 hours by Hezbollah "despite I feel there is difference between the two shots"

          

Mr.Kamal said that he is with the resistance and is not against Hezbollah ,with my all respect Mr. Kamal forgot to analyse the personality and character of Haj Imad,Haj Imad is a Shiite who was trained in Iran in the dune of the Islamic revolution on the term of sacrifice , already I do not need to speak about the sacrifice in Islam in general and in Shiite sect in specific, this man was acting as if he were in a holy war , in fact it was his holy war . Any biographer in my opinion should not be biased with or against the character ,and this is why Dr.Latifa Sallam's biography about King Farouk is considered the Best because she did not make him appear an angel or a devil but a human who she tried to analyse his behaviour based on what she had from second hand information.

By the way many think that it is strange I would admire the Shiite group or late Imad , well guess what it is me only many Egyptians do like them , may be because  they hate Israel and proud to find someone else who can stand against the IDF , still for me I admire for another reason and this reason I believe many military personalities from the top famous generals and experts share it with me , how they are so organized , how they managed to fool Israel and America ,not all militias are like this

79750680

Anyhow back to late Imad , the son of the simple farmer from the South of Lebanon who moved to the Southern Suburb thanks to the civil war and sooner he became a part of it . He did not look for fame or popularity and this is another thing I admire him for , because we live in a region everyone adores fame and seeking for it .

26 comments:

  1. When you say "despite I feel there is difference between the two shots" ...what do u mean? Do you feel that this is the photo of 2 different people or just that the man in the 2nd photo has aged and gained weight from the 1st photo?

    I am curious...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Zeinobia:
    [[millions were spent to catch him but in vain]]

    at all, according to your editorial, so one(s) is(are) worthy to claim the loot!

    Muslim Against Sharia:
    mutual feelings [i hope it's real], a long list that become one bastard less, let's hope the trend will keep its momentum ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. @n.American, it is the weight and age , I think at first I thought they are two different personalities but I checked and it turned to be the age and weight fact

    @Muslims against Sharia , just a silly stupid useless question , would you congratulate it even if it is the Muslims whether they are with or against Sharia !!!??

    @loudlaughter , surely the reward played a factor here

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zeinobia,

    It is silly stupid useless question; it makes no sense. Elimination of any terrorist who is responsible for hundreds of lives, regardless of whether he or she is a Muslim or not, pro or against Sharia, should be celebrated.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "already Kamal identifies himself as Arabic Nationalist in other words he hates Iran"
    ....
    So..any Arab Nationalist hates Iran to the bones? Is that like a logical necessity?...As far as I know the Arab Nationalist media cheers for Hizbollah and the resistance, and they know pretty well that Hizbollah is packed by Iran...
    Your accusation for Kamal to be bias is itself biased

    ReplyDelete
  6. "So..any Arab Nationalist hates Iran to the bones? Is that like a logical necessity"

    Yes hatred between Arabs and Iranians is a deterministic necessity, indeed!

    Simply because Iran views Arab natiolaism as a barrrier halting its integration into the midle east. Or else, how would anyone expalin Iran's persistent attempts to destabilise the Iraqian south by playing on the Shiite card. It doesn't make a difference here whether it was the Shah or the Ultra- nationalist Safavid Khomeinist Iran. It was Khomeini who launched a war on Arab nationalism in Iraq which was being utilised by Baathists to disintegrate sectarian and religous boundaries and to modernise the backward Iraqian south.

    At this specific point in time, Iran is pepetuating ethnic cleansing campaign against Arabs in Iraq it doesn't differentiate between Sunnis and shiites, It targets all secualrs, Arab nationalsits or, simply any one who opposes the Iranian presence in Iraq

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Muslim against Sharia , you know it will be a stupid question when there is a correct defintion for terrorism in this world

    @anonymous , I am sorry that I did not explain myself more concerning this part, yes there are many Arab nationalists who support Hezbollah and hate Israel but on the other hand there are many Arab nationalists who hate Iran for no real reason , it is all based on the rivalry between Arabs and Persians , it came back again during the rise of the Arab nationalism and unfortunately reached to the top during Saddam , those nationalists who think Saddam is a hero will be against everything related to Iran and by nature they will be against Hezbollah , if you are following blog you will know that I suffered from one of them for a long time
    The rivalry between the Arabs and the Iranians unfortunately is always heated by others ,during 1960s the Shah was on the west side where as Egypt leading the Arabs was on the U.S.S.R side and now we switched the seats we became on America's side and they became on Russia's side
    Both nations should live this stupid racist old concepts

    ReplyDelete
  8. Zeinobia,

    "@Muslim against Sharia , you know it will be a stupid question when there is a correct defintion for terrorism in this world"

    If you are too dumb to understand what terrorism is, you're bound to ask stupid questions.

    Terrorism is targeting (not to be confuses with collateral damage) innocent people (people who do not have innocent blood on their hands.)

    Mugniyeh was a terrorist because he had plenty of innocent blood on his hands. Assassinating Mugniyeh was NOT an act of terrorism for the same reason.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It funnels down to a very simple fact to which which some, for various reasons, opt to turn a blind eye. Namely, the Iranian death squads in Iraq-Something Iranians don't even bother to take the effort of denying, since it is all too well known to every one, except maybe for some illiterate citizens.

    The reason many Arab nationalists as well ordinary Arab citizens hate Iran and correctly so, is because of its destructive destabilsing deeds in Iraq. As simple as that!

    Never the less, when It comes to Hisbollah, it is supposedly an Arab group , its fanbtic ideology and anti Arabism in addition to its links to the Iranian death squads in Iraq is not all that well-known to all Arabs. Thank god,however, that is changing at the hands of the honest people exposing the Iranian crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. To Muslims Against Shari'a
    I visited ur website and found that you have the peace sign on the front page.
    It is the sign of pacifism, if you don't know, and it implies that the holder of such a sign doesn't agree on any sort of violent attacks, not matter who is the target.

    Even if Moghneiya is a terrorist, then he should be brought to court justice, not 'street justice.' Revenge is very different than justice.

    You nick name "Muslims against Shar'ia' implied that you know nothing about Islam nor Sharia.

    You comments proved that you also don't know anything about peace and pacifism.

    And you calling Zeinobia a dumb, is against Islam and good manner- things that you absolutely don't know anything about...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ahmed,

    You are even dumber than you look. If you weren't that dumb, you would have read the link/article that addresses the point of court justice v. street justice instead of manifesting your stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  12. To each & every bitch or bastard who call blowing people a "resistance"

    FUCK YOUUUUUUUU

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ahmed

    [[Even if Moghneiya is a terrorist, then he should be brought to court justice, not 'street justice.' Revenge is very different than justice.]]

    and who will be able to do that while the syrian regime is protecting him???

    your proposal assures your idiocy

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Ahmed , I think you are right ,I agree with

    @Muslims against Sharia , you may be against Sharia but you do believe that Muslim is the one with good tongue who does not hurt the other with

    @anonymous,please keep it clean in my blog ,by the way G.W BUsh and his army also bomb people

    @loudlaughter ,one of the lessons of democracy that you respect others with different opinion ,you do not make fun or insult them because may be after 50 years they will be right and you will be wrong , may be after 50 years both of you will be wrong

    ReplyDelete
  15. Zeinobia,

    It's because of people like you, who do not stand up to the evil, we're all getting screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, if it is not possible to put him in trial, then there is no legitimate justification to kill him. Nobody actually knows whether he was really involved in most of the attacks he is accused of masterminding. He died and the truth died with him....

    The idea of assassination itself is unethical, and ethics shouldn't be compromised under any circumstances.

    How many civilian lives have been jeopardized in this operation? And what is the difference between a terrorist and his assassins if both would sacrifice ethics and human lives to prove their points.

    In respect to Zeinboia's request to keep it clean, I will not reply to the ad hominems. I will just remind you with the Allah's words in his Holy Book: "O you who believe! let not (one) people laugh at (another) people perchance they may be better than they, nor let women (laugh) at (other) women, perchance they may be better than they; and do not find fault with your own people nor call one another by nicknames; evil is a bad name after faith, and whoever does not turn, these it is that are the unjust" Qur'an 49:11

    ReplyDelete
  17. dear ahmed...

    [[The idea of assassination itself is unethical, and ethics shouldn't be compromised under any circumstances.]]

    next time you intend to issue a proposal about ethics, please HIGHLIGHT that clearly, coz i don't want to discuss ethics with jerks, and you will spare me calling you names

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Muslims against Sharia , look just like Ahmed these hijack planes were only said to be hijacked by him , there is no solid proof about at all , only western sources "one side only" from a realist point of view if you look back again to this era , you will see that the hijackers were very proud with thy were doing from the PLO , PPF ...etc, it was the fashion , Imad did not come and say that he was behind it like them , he was responsible on the marines operation and he was proud of it
    Already I do not think what he did against the Marines was an act of terrorism it was an act of resistance
    Tell me is your Islam against Resistance ?? what is your definition of resistance ??
    was Gamila Bouharid an algerian terrorist from your perspective.
    Already I wonder how can you be Muslims and against the Sharia , do you know first what is the sharia before you speak and start jumping in the wagon !!??

    @Ahmed, you are classy ,let them say what they want

    @loudlaughter, sorry but trashing opinions and people like is not an act of freedom of expression , you know respect the other's opinion

    ReplyDelete
  19. Zeinobia & Ahmed,

    When people call you fucking morons, you should not be insulted, because a "fucking moron" in your case is an accurate description rather that an insult. A piece of shit like Mugniyeh hurts Muslims more than any Sharons or Olmerts ever could. And fucking morons like you make it possible.

    ReplyDelete
  20. For "Muslims??" Against Sharia...

    [When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we only Want to make peace!"
    Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, but they realise (it) not."] Qur'an 2:11-12.

    Rest assured that this is all what you got,! some disrespectful comments that you falsely think they would make any difference.
    You might think of yourself as a free thinker, a freedom fighter, a Muslim reformist...etc...but you are nothing more than a microscopic faithless entity that wont get any support from conservative Muslims, nor any respect form moderate ones.

    Your ideas are for foreign consumptions..for Right Winged Islamophobes who would love to imagine that you represent the true face of Islam- a religion that you know nothing about.

    Keep blogging in vain, keep howling and cursing till you get tired of it. Your effort will lead to nothing even in a million year....
    ....


    for Laud Laughter:
    "The (faithful) slaves of the Beneficent are they who walk upon the earth modestly, and when the foolish ones address them answer: Peace;" Qur'an 25:63
    .......Peace!

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Muslims against Sharia, I know that Peaceful muslims do not use bad words, do not mock other people because may the other are better than them "according to the Holy Quran or do you consider this from that sharia you are against ?? "
    Again you did not answer my questions , what type of resistance you recognize ?? What do you think the famous Syrian Nizar Qabbani ?? DO not tell me you never hear about him ??

    ReplyDelete
  22. Zeinobia,

    I don't know enough about Nizar Qabbani to comment. I recognize resistance as legitimate if it does not target civilians or peacekeepers. When resistance starts targeting civilians it stops being resistance and becomes terrorism.

    And what kind of idiot would object to use of bad language while at the same time objecting to elimination of a mass murderer?

    ReplyDelete
  23. "And what kind of idiot would object to use of bad language while at the same time objecting to elimination of a mass murderer?"

    Let me try to put that bizarre question in a comprehensible logical argument, because I had to read it twice to understand the relation between its premises..

    What you mean to say is that I should

    a) either support the assassination of an alleged terrorist without a fair trial or

    b) accept the usage of bad language.

    But for you, I am an idiot to do both, reject the assassination and the bad language!!

    Hmm...very impressive logic!

    You really do have a chance in convincing millions of Muslims to follow your believes.
    I am sure that if your bad language didn't do the trick, assassinations will!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ahmed,

    "had to read it twice to understand the relation between its premises"

    Apparently twice was not enough. The point was that it is quite hypocritical to be offended by language while not being offended of the fact that mass murderer is roaming free.

    "Alleged" terrorist? You are a dumb fuck!

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Muslim against Sharia again What Ahmed is Saying is that all what we know about Imad is based on the western sources , with my all respect the French considered Gamila Bouharid as a terrorist , was she ??
    do you understand what I am trying to say ?? judging people so simply like this in a world full of deception is not an easy thing .
    I do not take every word published by the U.S government and Israel as a fact because with my all respect both of them lie
    call me moron or what ever but this is what I think

    ReplyDelete
  26. "all what we know about Imad is based on the western sources"

    This "we" may apply to you, but it does not apply to us. There are plenty of Muslim sources corroborating western contentions. On the other hand, ANY Hizballah operative is a legitimate military target.

    ReplyDelete

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.