Friday, August 12, 2011

Ramadan Arabian Nights 2011 : Princess Badr Al Budur and the sultan of gypsies “Ep.5”

Sorry for the delay, tonight we will continue our tale, the tale of Princess Badr Al Budur and the Sultan of gypsies or rather the tale of Nasin and Ramesh El-Ain inside Princess Badr Al Budur's tale. 

If you have missed the first parts of Prince Ramesh El Ain’s tale, you can go to the previous posts.

Shahyer and Sheherzade from  Dalziel's Illustrated Arabian Nights' Entertainments
Shahyer and Sheherzade from 
Dalziel's Illustrated Arabian Nights' Entertainments

Second, here is the 5th part of Princess Badr Al Budur and the Sultan of gypsies Damdam or to be accurate the third part of Prince Ramesh El Ain’s tale.

 Now tonight there is a little missing part in our story that you probably have guessed from last time; Princess Nasin of Djinn’s world has fallen in love with prince Ramesh El Ain of man’s world “Inter-universal love story” after meeting him once again.

We do not have that second meeting but we have known that the lovers drank from the same water seller in their journeys and that his water is not like any regular water. 

Anyhow there is a new challenge for both lovers from two different worlds, their king parents decided that they should get married from their own worlds. Nasin will escape and Ramesh is losing his mind technically after falling in love with a magical being he only saw twice.

The theme of lovers who share food or water is from the recurring themes in one thousand and one night by the way.

I believe Taher Abu Fasha changed the names of the heroes in the tales, nevertheless, I will not lose hope to find the original tales in the book and inshAllah I will. 

I think it is an original tale from 1001 because it is hard for any author in our time to write a tale inside tale in this way.

Till next night inshallah.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.