I did not want to publish anything new related to El-Qemany but I could not stop myself from Sharing this video , a debate between Screenplay writer and journalist Balal Fadl and journalist Nabil Sharf El-Din , the famous pro-west journalist.
I like Fadl, I always like him whether as a journalist or screenplay writer and I do not like Sharf El-Din whether as a journalist or so-called internet citizen. Balal is independent writer and he can’t be considered an Islamist. It is enough to say about Sharf El-Din that he used to defend Guantánamo!!
I read Balal Fadl’s daily column at Al Masry Al Youm where he exposed the fraud of Siad El-Qemany. Again Balal is not a radical Islamist at all , in fact he is being attacked by the radicals , anyhow I believe El-Qemany and his supporters are angry that the blow came this time from someone they did not expect ,someone who is not Youssef El-Badry
Again here is Siad El-Qemany and here are some of his supporters like Abdel Manam Said and Nabil Sharf El-Din.
Dear Zenobia,
ReplyDeleteI do like bilal fadl too,but I also believe in
sayed elqemeny.Not every body who tries to storm his or her brain is a fraud my dear friend...!!!
thanks anyway
what do you mean guys he is secular and radical same time? i mean how come someone can be black and white same time??
ReplyDelete@اخر ايام الخريف
ReplyDeletestorm his brain as he wants but he does not buy his PhD nor chooses what he likes for unconfirmed unreal historical accounts and says it is true.
@The count of Montecristo, yes he is a radical secular , why do you limit radicalism on religious parties only ?? did not you hear about radical leftist groups in Europe ?? or radical environmentalists ???
Every thing in this world has an extreme dear
آخر أيام الخريف
ReplyDeleteI do not think that someone who attacks or questions religion is storming his brain!!!
This Sharf el din is not shareef at all, i dunno how come will he defend himself before Allah on the Day of Resurrection.
@ Zenobia: www.sharek.eg
@Heather
ReplyDeleteNo body knows who is sinful or who is faithful except Allah the Almighty.We do not have the right of accusing people in their religious honour just because we disagree with them.
Remember that Mohamed Abdo (May Allah rest his soul)faced the same objections..!!!This is always our mentality...!!!
@ Zenobia
No body can say that Fadl's claims about the PhD are true until a legal invesyigation is carried out.This is a constitutional right for every citizen.
آخر أيام الخريف
ReplyDeleteHe bought it for $ 200
1- i would like u to check this website: www.almesryoon.com
2-Google Al-Qemny's article الرد على التشكيك في رحلتى العلمية to see that he confessed his fraud PhD and in his articles he keeps giving justifications.
3-I am inviting u to listen to his interviews on utube and u will know that he is calling for evil bec separation of the state from religion is great mischief, as there is a big diff between achieving a mastery of technology and getting rid of religion.
He said in one of them:
نحن بحاجة الى اللحاق بآخر قاطرة في قطار الحداثة قبل ما تغادر والا هنخرج برا الجغرافيا زي ما خرجنا من التاريخ"
i remember the prophet (PBUH) said,
لتتبعن سنن من كان قبلكم ....حتى لو دخلوا جحر ضب تبعتموهم
I wanna tell u that when we (the west)get to know the true Islam, we envy u (east) and we cry bec simply we were at a loss! This happened to me and most of the converters. Islam is a comprehensive religion, it did not leave anything without explanation. U were lucky to be born as Muslims but unfortunately some Muslims do not appreciate this great gift.
As an ex-christian, i refuse his accusations against virgin Mary, let alone his ideas about islam.
I am not accusing him of blasphemy, bec as u said i am not a god to judge him.
if u r talking abt Mr. Sharaf el deen? Did u listen to him well? Do u think he defended Mr. Al-Qemny! i am not accusing him of anything but it is clear that he is as Egyptians say حافظ مش فاهم
secularism is a moderate ideology it self so how come he is a radical?? i mean if he likes his secularism a lot still this doesn't make him a radical, still what you tell doesn't make any sense.
ReplyDeleteI havent read any of his writings or watched him on any channel. Since I am away Ive been following this story from what has been published etc.
ReplyDeleteCouple of points:
- A follower of any idea/faith etc can become radical. Why is it so surprising to have a radical pro-secularism?
- There is a huge difference bet being pro-secularism and attacking the faith of others. There is also a huge difference between analytically researching certain concepts or even incidents as related to a religion in search of a better understanding or an addition of some sort and simply attacking a religion or faith to gain some fame. We've seen Salman Roushdi and others profiting from attacking a religion they decided to blame for all their misery and well do we still hear about such names? Sure they got the fame and the money, which is exactly what they wanted but the ploy has been uncovered and after their 5 minutes in the spotlight they are out.
I'm all for the freedom of speech. I'm also one of those who still dream that one day we will have a country were all ideas are welcomed but also one where in such incidents when someone abuse such freedom of speech and exploit it to instigate hate or insult others, then the law and the courts could be a trusted venue to make sure that such freedom is not abused.
- If his Ph.D. is a fake and he knew it then this man doesnt not only deserve to have the award withdrawn from him, he should be banned from teaching, lecturing etc, bec I simply can not imagine any reputable institution or entity who would host a fake person like him. More important, according to the current rules, the public prosecutor needs to get involved and those who acknowledged the phd should be questioned as well and a review of any degrees granted to others by the same entity and acknowledged as acceptable by the Egyptian ministry of higher education should be also withdrawn.
Belal Fadl is well prepared and I think his question as to why did the Egy government fall for awarding a radical is a valid and crucial question and that we the ppl deserve an answer. I also read Mr. Belal's article on the same issue in Al masry al youm and while I like many of his articles I found my self wondering if you have all this information why are you hiding the names? When will our journalists learn that if you have a valid and well-based story you owe it to the ppl to give them the whole truth. I want to know who knew about the fake phd and kept silent until now? do they or he realize that if they or he had spoken the truth earlier this fake of a person wouldve never been left to profit out of a fake degree? Al Saket 3an el 7aq Shitanon A7'ras