Saturday, May 24, 2008

At last there will be a President for Lebanon

I can't believe that at last Michel Soliman will be the President of Lebanon at last and I can't believe that Presidential palace will receive him with his family tomorrow.

On the other hand  I do not think that that will be the happy ending of the conflict in Lebanon because as long as Hezbollah got its arms ready for Israel , Syria is not under the American control and the political leaders in Lebanon are from the kind of Jumblatt,Geagea and Gemayel; Lebanon will always live in the shadow of the civil war.

Already you can see Paris now is criticizing the Doha agreement saying that it did not reach to nothing regarding the arms and telecommunication network of Hezbollah , Washington welcomed the agreement in a very weak way.

The 14th of March team had to reach an agreement with opposition because they were in the weaker position , they lost the ground and they could not play more diplomatic games with opposition because Lebanon reached the point with no return from two weeks ago.

Again this is a truce which I hope it will last enough time until Egypt regains its real position in the region.

12 comments:

  1. So long as the Iranian dirt keep on controling Lebanon there will be problems

    ReplyDelete
  2. God , what you are saying is not only totally wrong, it defies common sesne the same way flies and winged-cockroashes challenge gravitational fields!


    The Iranian client Nasarallh believes in Welayait Faquih- a fanatic starnge Iranian doctrine which calls for bringing on war and blood so as to invoke the " Hidden Mhadi" to arrive and spread justice throughout earth. The fact that Nasarallh beleives in welayit Faqueeh means that he is a toal subordinate of the MONKEY ALI-KHAMEINI.

    Hence, It seems to me that Iran wants to flex its muscles in the region a little bit so as to gain more footage in its negotiations with the Americans over killing Iraqis and sharing the turfs of the torn Iraq.

    Hisbollah brought on the total destruction of Lebanon, further entrenched secatarian division, and invited foreign troops into Lebanon by its uncalled for attack on Israel. I say uncalled for because Lebanmon has no occupied territories except for a very small farmland. And of course an attack like that could have never liberated it by force. On the contrary, the outcome was having more parts of Lebanon occupied. But anyway, Nasarallh's blind obedience of the MONKEY ALI-KHAEMINI had perfectly fitted into the role drawn up for Hisbollah on the THE AGENDA OF THE DIRTY TERORRIST CRIMINAL IRAN RULED BY THE TERRORIST BLOODY BABOONS- NAJAD, KHAMEINI AND KHATEMI.

    Now it seems that Iran wants an independent pro-Iran state in the south.

    It is unbvelievable that in a soveriegn country, which used to be the Switzerland of the Middle-East, some secatarian faction that is totally subordinate to a dirty terrorist country like Iran, installs cameras and communication networks, run by bloody terrorist Iranians, exclusive for itself inside an independent country.

    What is worse, Iran has given the orders to its clients to use force against the stae, if it tries to practice its legitmate authorities over the capital air port!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Now think with me what do the Baboons in Qum-Najad, Khameni and Khatemi want!???

    I will give you nickle, once you have figured out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, by the way. Watch what the former secretary general of Hisbollah had to say about Nasarallh and his relation with the terrorist treacherous ZOROASTAR Iran:



    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/89/1389.htm




    Also watch the views of this prominent LEBANESE SHIITE CLERIC of Iran and Hisbollah:

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/89/1615.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anon#1,


    besides being rude and condescending towards a great people with a breadth of history.....YOU HAD TO TRIGGER AMRE,

    da zayy afreet el aelba

    ReplyDelete
  5. watch this clip it is about A British member of the parliment had to say about president Nasser and Saddam.

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1773.htm

    ReplyDelete
  6. @amre, I do not ask for much or for the impossible that you do not come here , already you said before that you will not come here as long as no mentions you by any harm , and I kept my promise still you are not a man of your word because you are insisting to come and comment here
    I am not a rude person , I am nervous , but I am not rude one unfortnately I was brought up to be polite and believe that your right can't be retrived in that way nor opinion can be imposed ,I can't call your parents and family names as you call mine because my family raised me to respect others , especially the elder , I can't call your mom names because I am not that weak
    You are not that strong when you call me names and copy/ paste comments in my blog every where even when it is not related to the blog
    Please and I will continue use this language not as a sign of weakness but as a sign of strength
    Do not come here again

    ReplyDelete
  7. you commited a sin when you went the Iranian dirt's blog an dsaid not to care about me!!!!!

    That was rude. Secondly, there were relvent posts where I posted my point of view. However, you deleted my posts which pinned down your your weak point. On the other hands you aloowed the comments of other Iranians like "Farhad".

    That was very dirty and low on your part because since you decided to engage in a conversation, then yo shoul allow all opinions.

    Also in another rpost regarding the kurds you selectiveluy published some of my comments while you published others. Your aim was to make my points sound insistent in the argument.


    Finally Zaynobia, you shouldn't prpoagate Iranioan propaganda on Egyptian blogsphere.

    being a dafavid Taqiyah shiite is mate rof perconal choice.

    Yet you are not allowed to advocate the malignant ideologies of the dirty rotted driveling farting dog AYATOLAH KHOMEINI,

    You are alsonot allowedto defent the traitor Iranian agent-Hasan Nasarallh

    Keep yoiur rotten safavid faith to yourself, and I will never come here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @amre , a sin , do you know what is the real meaning of a sin ?? already who are you to allow me this and not to allow me that ??
    who are you to put barriers on my views and tell me to do this and NOT to do that ??
    Who are you and who gave you the permission to say what shall I do in my blog ??
    This is my blog , my forum , my zone
    Already just little correction I did not delete your posts , I deleted your comments; POSTS ARE IN YOUR BLOG DEAR NOT IN MINE , PLEASE CHECK YOUR BLOGGING INFO
    and I have all right to do this after insulting me , my family and my friends with worst names
    this is Zeinobia's Egyptian Chronicles , and insh Allah It will be that , it is not your blog
    understand this IT IS NOT YOUR BLOG , YOU GOT YOUR BLOG TO SAY WHAT EVER YOU WANT
    ALREADY I DO NOT KNOW WHY DO NOT YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE FACT THAT THIS IS MY SPACE AND I AM ENTITLED TO EXPRESS MY THOUGHTS IN IT AS FAR AS I WANT ,YOU LIVE IN FREE COUNTRY ,SO WHY YOU DO NOT ACT LIKE THEM ,BUT I AM SURPRISED BECAUSE YOUR IDOLS WERE ENEMIES OF EXPRESSION , THEY USED THIS WEAK LANGUAGE FULL OF HATE IF ANYONE DARED AND SAID SOMETHING THEY DO NOT LIKE
    AGAIN I WILL SPEAK AS I WANT TO AND I WILL NOT GIVE MY ORDERS IN FACT I DO NOT WANT TO SEE YOU HERE AGAIN
    HAVE SOME DIGINTY WHEN A LADY , A WOMAN TELLS YOU NOT COME HERE AGAIN , THEN BE A MAN WITH ONE ATOM OF DIGNITY AND DO NOT COME HERE AGAIN
    LAST THING I DO NOT WANT TO BE RUDE BUT PLEASE CHECK YOUR SPELLING

    ReplyDelete
  9. :))

    you started off the whole thing when you went off to dirty Iranian's blog and left rude remarks about me.........

    This is A BIG SIN.....

    You are entitled to have your own views and express them in any way whatsoever, but to make rude comments about me on an Iranian blog, then that is the unforgiven sin.

    Express your own views as much as you wantt; But never come by i a rude way.


    Secondly, yes, of course, you have the right to prevent me from commenting here. Nevertheless, in the post I am talking about you allowed some of my posts- while youdeliberately omiited others.

    Well, you should have deleted my whole array of comments or asked me not comment ( back then things were alright) but acting in that safavid lowly Iranian manner was wrong.



    Finally, you are totally free but defending the enemies of Egypt-Iran is totally forbidden. Have I made myself clear!?

    ReplyDelete
  10. @amre, again who are you to give me order ?? seriously do not you think that I do not have to do anything from what you are saying
    I mean you are using big words "a sin to speak about me bla bla bla" as calling my mom who is better than billions of your kind names is not a sin"

    "I forbid , you can , make myself clear "

    can you please tell me why do I have to obey your orders ??

    dear I stop deleting your comments because I have no time for to delete them , you see I got a life and important things to cover instead of wasting my time of deleting

    already I feel that I am wasting a time in this useless conversation with someone thinks that he owns the Universe and think that he will force to obey his order

    ReplyDelete
  11. Like a perfect safavid retard, you refrained from geting near the core point; that is the rude comments you made about me at some dirty Iranian's blog.

    That is a defintion of asin. Nobody Zaynab in Egypt or outside of Egypt can ever commit a sin like that and get away with it.

    Regarding your mom, So long as she is wearing the chador, and sticks to the safavid faith, she can never be better than anybody

    ReplyDelete
  12. Amr el Abyad , is polluting this blog too ? wow . Either you follow his Baath Propaganda or you are a safavidt . Grow up Amr . the Iranians have faults and saddam was a criminal and a murderer !

    ReplyDelete

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.